Centennial Times - January 3, 1862 - Maryland secessionists
January 3, 1862
The Kind Of Secessionists We Have In Maryland
A is a secessionist because the fugitive slave law has not been enforced, which subjected South Carolina to such disastrous losses that the Union must be dissolved as a means of self-preservation.
B because Maryland should be united with Virginia—therefore if Virginia had abolished slavery twenty years ago as Charles J. Faulkner wished her to do, Maryland should have followed suit.
C, having been born in Pennsylvania, must necessarily have “Southern proclivities” after emigrating to Maryland.
D is a novel-reading young lady who imagines that each and every rebel soldier is sole owner and possessor of 500 acres and 1000 slaves, and the presence of such an army in Maryland would present plenty of “good catches”.
E believes in state’s rights when states do what he thinks is right.
F is an old lady who thinks she and her daughter cannot be aristocratic unless they proclaim themselves “Southern”.
G is opposed to Black Republicanism and turns up his nose at the “Lincoln Flag”— the Stars and Stripes—but for the protection of which, G’s forefathers might be in Europe and G be an organ grinder.
H has a second cousin whose aunt lives in Arkansas, and H “can never take up arms to shed the blood of his kindred”.
I was raised a Democrat, and has not yet learned that the definition of Democracy is not Breckinridge, Bridge Burning and Treason.
J has an eye to matrimony and if an opportunity presents itself, will marry a lady who owns slaves—if he can.
K is one of the fossil remains of the broken-down aristocracy, which can only be revived by an oligarchy or monarchy.
L is a reader of the Mail and believes that if "let alone”, Jeff Davis will peacefully bombard all the Union forts, burn the Capitol of the Country, and as a consequence happiness and peace will reign in the land.
M thinks Maryland should be liberated by the Chivalry from the oppressive weight of 30,000 majority cast for the Union.
N denies that he is a Secessionist, but wishes to see the Union as it was—the precise time in the past he does not specify, but supposed to be a few weeks before Columbus discovered America.
O agrees with N and wants Maryland to remain “neutral”, i. e., if Jeff Davis does not want the state, she will remain in the Union; if he does want it, beseech him to “take it up tenderly, handle with care”, etc.
P is in favor of the Union and the Constitution at all times, but in favor of the enforcement of the laws only with Jeff Davis’ approval.
Q is a timid man, likes to take care of himself, and knowing how tolerant the Government is in permitting men to express Secession sentiments, concludes it is safe to be a “Secesh”, particularly as his dreams are disturbed by visions of Beauregard and his army whose intolerance and despotism will prevent his whispering “Union”, if, as he fears (or hopes), they should cross the Potomac.
R is a peace man, but as Teakle Wallis, the apostle of peace, has issued no manifestos of late, R. has no theory by which peace is to be restored. By the time Wallis returns to Baltimore, perhaps sooner, Wallis will be enlightened by General McClellan.
S professes to be a Unionist— speaks of the Union Army as "our” Army—but for some reason S thinks is not understood, he has a dejected appearance when “our army” is victorious and is elated at the success of the rebel forces.
T has been north—travelled from one end of the Franklin Railroad to another, consequently knows what Northern sentiment is, and knows that Maryland and Pennsylvania cannot be at peace in the Union.
U only avows himself a Secessionist and hurrahs for Jeff Davis when intoxicated; when he presents himself for a pension from Uncle Sam, he is careful that he is not intoxicated.
V has an eye to the prosperity of Baltimore and fears that grass would grow in her streets, therefore he endorses the destruction of the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad as the best means of preventing the aforesaid streets from turning green.
W contends that Lincoln overstepped Constitutional limits in his efforts to quell the rebellion, and being a constitution-loving man, opposes the war, preferring that his friends in South Carolina should sink the old ship rather than that the President should strain a single rope to save it.
X fears war taxes, but is unconcerned about the losses sustained by the Government in the capture of Sumter or the plundering practised by Floyd & Co.
Y always said that “the Union” could not be preserved by fighting; — South Carolina, entertaining the same views, commenced the fight by attempting to assassinate Major Anderson.
Z in May last foresaw a war of 20 years duration—the capture of Hattaras reduced it in his estimation to 15—Floyd and Wise’s retreat from Western Virginia to 10—Commodore Dupont’s cannonading to 5—and General McClellan will in reality reduce it to 18 months. (Herald and
Used with permission of the Herald-Mail
59 x 33 cms
Washington County (Md.), history; Antietam, Battle of, Md., 1862; Sharpsburg, Battle of, Md., 1862; Centennial celebrations, etc:
Washington County (Md.), 1860-1862